Security and Policy Challenges

The 2014 US withdrawal plan from Afghanistan has ramifications for a country such as Pakistan like no other, given the geographical and cultural proximity with the war torn nation. The spill out effects of the plan could well and truly materialize in the form of a resurgence of militancy in the tribal areas, where a common ideology and close ties with the Afghan Taliban by the Tehrik I Taliban Pakistan could threaten the stability in the country. This scenario would test the mettle of the Sharif led government in the center which is known for its conservative policies.

The PML (N)’s ( Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz) comprehensive run to the finish line in the historic 2013 elections had followed bellicose rhetoric from leftist parties, such as the Pakistan People’s Party,  that the former had pandered towards terrorist outfits in the past. The pre-election violence which followed also gave a vague depiction of what impends for Sharif and how the withdrawal of US forces along with domestic realities could place him, his government, and the country in an unwarranted quagmire.

The reasons are obvious enough. An array of erudite analysts and experts consider the fall out effects of the withdrawal plan of 2014 as detrimental to regional stability. With insider attacks on the rise in Afghanistan and a strong case for military mutiny in the war torn country becoming a possibility, Sharif’s ability to counter balance between adopting a soft stance towards controversial outfits, along with great power interests in the region, will be the key for Pakistan to strategically place itself in tackling militancy.

His desire to forge good ties with neighboring India, on the other hand, is a good sign for the idealists and the economists, but fails to take into account several factors. India’s burgeoning economic rise and the push by Washington to have the world’s largest democracy play a leading role in reconstruction efforts in Afghanistan mandates a clear policy on tackling domestic terrorism if Pakistan is to play a crucial role in reconstruction and infrastructure development.

It would be interesting to note that his narrative has been ambiguous from the outset. His staunch stance on ending drone strikes on one hand reflects the desire to keep national interests intact, yet, with the battle against Al Qaeda receding and the US’s 12 year struggle to tackle Islamist militancy in the region coming to a close, Sharif has refrained from toeing a ‘ Pro- US’ policy as the previous government had. Hence, his ability to adopt a clear line of action lies solely on his domestic policy towards the Tribal Areas in Waziristan, where over 360 drone strikes took place over a decade. The spill out effects of the 2014 withdrawal plan would have an indirect impact on the restive belt which is home to various factions which challenge the writ of the state and are interlinked with one another.

Unlike his electoral rival, Imran Khan and his centrist party (The Pakistan Tehrik-I-Insaaf), Sharif has shunned away from ownership of the war on terror and renouncing American influence in its entirety. His party also could not come up with a clear cut policy line which considers forging a close alliance with the US as necessary to tackle the scourge of terrorism. So far, the ill of terrorism has been looked upon from an economic perspective, where the need to address the problem is narrowed down to tackling the economic woes of the militants.

Sadly, on-ground realities differ starkly from his conception, as both the Tehrik I Taliban Pakistan and the Afghan Taliban are funded extensively from their diasporas abroad and are hell bent upon imposing Sharia Law in both Afghanistan and Pakistan and challenging the writ of the state. The militancy in Pakistan has always assumed an ideological flavor and differs considerably from insurgencies such as the Naxalite and Maoist insurgency that has wreaked havoc in neighboring India since 2004, which has gained momentum due to economic deprivation. Hence, buying out the tribesmen or the militants is a belief that lacks conviction.

Of late, ties with the Pakistan military have also been shaky and could well define the course of tackling terrorism in the near future for this government. With the former President of Pakistan, Pervez Musharraf to be tried for treason under Article 6 of the constitution, a showdown with the military signals dangerous signs that can plunge the insurgent hit country into further political chaos, ( a vacuum that insurgents would be desperate to exploit). The military is also the de facto most powerful institution in the country, and Musharraf’s rule established his government as a steadfast ally of the US with over 17 billion dollars of aid being poured in which established the Pakistan as having adopted a pro-US policy since 1999. Important developments in September such as the 2013 change of guard for the COA ( Chief of Army Staff) or a possible extension for General Pervez Kayani would  mold the manner in which the Sharif government could tackle militancy given the history of military dictatorships how they have exclusively pandered towards a ‘Pro-US’ line.

Whether or not any joint cooperation mechanism to tackle terrorism can be forged between India, Pakistan and Afghanistan also depends heavily on Sharif’s ability to diplomatically maneuver his cards in the right direction. As the Prime Minister of a nuclear armed state, he must realize that security dynamics in the post 2014 scenario are far more convoluted. As a result, Pakistan could well be on course towards an economic recovery, but infrastructural projects would eventually become immaterial in a clash of such proportions. He has moved in the right direction though, as the recent spate of attacks on the Hazara Community in Quetta which claimed 30 lives, was condemned openly. It would be interesting to see whether an Anti- Terrorism bill is passed in the parliament; something that the outgoing Pakistan People’s Party had failed to enact. The opportunity is there for the taking.

Posted in , Afghanistan, Policy, Politics, Security

Hamzah Rifaat

Hamzah Rifaat is an anchor for Policy Beats, a current affairs and policy oriented web talk show series. He has over four years of broadcasting experience. He is a gold medalist with a Master of Philosophy degree in the discipline of peace and conflict studies from the National Defense University in Islamabad. He holds a diploma in World Affairs and Professional Diplomacy from the Bandaranaike Diplomatic Training Institute in Colombo, Sri Lanka. He was a freelance writer and blogger for the Friday Times and received a CRDF scholarship to the Middlebury Institute of International Studies, where he studied nonproliferation and terrorism studies at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies. He was also a Graduate Editorial Assistant for Women's International Perspective, a global source for women's perspectives, based in Monterey. He has also represented Pakistan as a member of the CTBTO Youth Initiative 2016. His writings encompass political and internal security issues in Pakistan and he regularly contributes for The Diplomat Magazine. Hamzah is a former SAV Visiting Fellow (January 2016).

Read more

Continue Reading

Stay informed Sign up to our newsletter below

4 thoughts on “Security and Policy Challenges

  1. The US and Pakistan have collectively made a mess in the South Asian region with their self centred and short sighted policies in Afghanistan during the cold war years. The duality of the use and abuse policies and duplicity between the supposed allies, represents a love/hate relationship.
    To believe that Pakistan can regain Afghanistan by militarily installing the proxy Taliban currently sheltered in Pakistan, is to live in a fools Paradise. As on date the US and Pakistan are the most hated countries in the minds of the Afghan people because of their devious and opportunistic pursuits there. With over $ 2 Billion spent on development projects in Afghanistan, India is well in the drivers seat of public perception. Both America and Pakistan must learn from India’s low key but very effective diplomacy.

  2. Pakistan will remain a primary player in Afghanistan. Afghanistan stability cannot be achieved without Pakistan is not a myth but ultimate reality. As it is evident from history that Pakistan had and will play a key role in stabilizing Afghanistan’s security situation. Pakistan and Afghanistan are knotted in a unique kind of relationship i.e. strong religious bonding, shared culture; 43 million ethnic pushtuns are living both sides of the border.
    Few days ago President Karzai visited Pakistan and formally requested that Pakistan should facilitate the peace talks between the Afghan government, the Taliban and Afghan high peace council. Pakistan’s Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif reiterated that Pakistan has and will support the Afghan peace process led by Afghan high peace council. The recent meeting has highlighted that Pakistan wants peaceful, prosperous and united Afghanistan.

  3. Whether Afghanistan would gain stability post 2014, or a civil war would break out in Afghanistan, Pakistan will be the loser either way.
    1. The Afghans do not like Pakistan, never liked Pakistan, ask an Afghan and he would confirm it. In the event of a stable Afghanistan, the Afghans will never allow Pakistan to dominate and dictate.
    2. In the event of a civil war in Afghanistan, it will spill over to Pakistan, adding fuel to already burning Pakistan.

  4. You need to check your facts–Pakistan neither wants chaos nor want complete Taliban rule in Afghanistan. Pakistan’s Afghan policy is based upon on the notion of non-interference and mutual respect. As I have mentioned earlier that Pakistan and Afghanistan are intertwined together into a strong religious bonds, geographic proximity and above all 43 million Pushtuns are living in both sides of the border. Moreover, approximately 3 million Afghan refugees are living in Pakistan.

    The recent US and Taliban peace talks in Doha, facilitated by the Pakistan, has once again highlighted that Pakistan strongly looks forward for the restoration of peace and stability in Afghanistan.

    But, it would be very difficult for India to sustain its broader footprints in Afghanistan, after the US/Nato draw-down in 2014.In post 2014 scenario, India will not have the luxury to operate under the “US/NATO Umbrella” in Afghanistan. It is and it will be the biggest challenge to India’s Afghan policy?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *